it occurs to me that iambic pentameter is a little bit like the current Republican regime: the best that they can do is to try to disguise what they are doing. A good Bushista tries to mouth centrist sentiments while doing his nefarious, extremist reactionary things. I'm being a little tongue-in-cheek here. But it seems to me that the better iambic pentameter that has been done in the twentieth and the twenty-first centuries is iambic pentameter that doesn't draw attention to itself. That seems really odd, actually. So if that's the good iambic pentameter — the iambic pentameter that doesn't draw attention to itself— and the point of it is to mime natural speech but somehow to be obeying the rules in a clandestine way, that seems fairly odd to me.
OMG FASCIST PENTAMETER! This is funny because, as some of you might recall, I

Anyway, with regards to content, there really is no such thing as a good political poem. I defy you to show me one. Stop trying, you can't, okay? It's just impossible. Poetry is successful when it shows us a new way of thinking, not when it tells us what to think or tries to shock us into just emoting. That's why meterical subversion is actually political and Allen Ginsberg is nightstand decoration. So good job L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E poets! You bug me, but you are smarter than basically everyone else who publishes poetry. Just stop writing poems about Derrida and then complaining that no one pays attention to you.
*Billy Collins you will always make a million dollars every day and eat lobster in your hot tub no matter what I write about you and I need to acknowledge that now, because as far as American poetry is concerned you are a fucking GANGSTER. Okay? Respect.
No comments:
Post a Comment